<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bit of Fluff on Newcomb&#8217;s Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://avromandina.net/avrom/2008/12/a-bit-of-fluff-on-newcombs-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://avromandina.net/avrom/2008/12/a-bit-of-fluff-on-newcombs-paradox/</link>
	<description>Analytic Philosophy for Fun (not Profit)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:16:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Pearson</title>
		<link>http://avromandina.net/avrom/2008/12/a-bit-of-fluff-on-newcombs-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://avromandina.net/avrom/2008/12/a-bit-of-fluff-on-newcombs-paradox/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Rationality is just a label we apply to things. It has no existance within the world.

E.g. you may call winning 1 million pounds irrational, but at the end of the day they still have 1 million pounds.

You could use your example to construct scenarios where blowing up the universe is labelled rational...

It is a fine argument for there being something wrong with your conception of rationality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rationality is just a label we apply to things. It has no existance within the world.</p>
<p>E.g. you may call winning 1 million pounds irrational, but at the end of the day they still have 1 million pounds.</p>
<p>You could use your example to construct scenarios where blowing up the universe is labelled rational&#8230;</p>
<p>It is a fine argument for there being something wrong with your conception of rationality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

